The Infosys global supply chain management blog enables leaner supply chains through process and IT related interventions. Discuss the latest trends and solutions across the supply chain management landscape.

Main

December 03, 2008

....Customer demands "Where is the tangible translation of my Compliance to revenue you promised from my SRM solution, show me? "

Has a post implementation experience ever hunted you down with such statements from the customer?
Are you ready with the metrics, have you even thought about how to have these metrics strategized and signed off even before you could possibly track them.
How can you measure it, how will you show that realization from day 30 post go-live, 1month would be a very tight time frame to really show benefits on the P&L, but today’s customers, for sure are going to.
Trying to pitch in for a recent SRM proposal, I have been asked these questions on what your strategy is going to be, to make me realize on post implementation benefits.
Are you going to fool us in the rhetoric of an opportunity by showing flashy Aberdeen figures on what best in class people have reaped, and wash your hands off, post implementation, or you’ll assure us with metrics, track them post go live.
Will you reassure us of getting feedback from the CFO desk comes back saying “what a wonderful solution you’ve implemented, you’ve reduced transactional, operational costs with the auditors being really happy with the compliant transactions, processes etc, WOW we can see the affect on the P&L, great job done!!!!!!
Now let’s go one step below trying to collaborate the thought process of the SRM fraternity to arrive at some strategy, can we build a template that’s true by itself to help consultants keep their face upright with metrics to address heavy customer questions.
What are those possible metrics?
Q) What are those metrics that can translate compliant transactions to remarkable tangible savings (indirectly the revenue)?
Track maverick spend before go live and directly compare with contractual spend post go-live
Q)  Should we do this category wise before and after the implementation
Identify those top 10 categories accounting to the highest spend, give a percentage that is achievable and then track it post go-live
Q)     Implementation of Enterprise wide Contract Management v/s a customer situation with no such traces
Most companies wouldn’t have had the thought for Buy/Sell side Contract management, will this before and after comparison help?
Q)  Analyzing Spend and giving them the facts about their very own state of affairs with the existing SRM landscape if any
      This would typically translate to running the spend analytics tool and giving them a picture of  their spend health, where they stand in terms of compliance, maverism, their weak links, whether they need strong backing from kicking off Sourcing projects (typical category management) or even do a business process re-engineering before opting for a full blown implementation.
This is what all I could think of, if there are real facts that you’ve faced in the demanding regime of tough customers, let’s arrive at a broader discussion frontier
I would say there is no demanding customer, lets reasonable customer. We are all Customer’s at the end of the day.
“Why would I be investing in a solar powered heating system in my house, would I benefit on lowering my electricity bill, on an average I want to see @least 200 bucks saving every month, so do you call me demanding or questioning something I’ve been promised of”.

Let’s work towards building some metrics around these lines coming handy in getting the customers, Value for their money, their lean IT budgets.

I repeat what I ended the last time with, "Whatever it is it has to be real"

-Tridip

 

 

November 19, 2008

Automate, Integrate, Extend….err Exploit

Continuing from one of my previous blog post on the need to make Information Management central to spend visibility initiatives, I offer my views today on the pivotal role spend visibility initiatives play in Procurement transformational journey. And I do so, on the back-drop of three simple yet powerful words - “Automate, Integrate and Extend”.

Continue reading "Automate, Integrate, Extend….err Exploit" »

November 04, 2008

Aligning to the best practices for combating challenges faced in contract management

In my last blog, I shared my point of view about the importance of contracts during the “R” times. Now I would like to share my thoughts on the challenges in leveraging contract management and best practices in contracts management.

One of the major challenges is that Organization’s contracting principles are sketched around the package they use and not with respect to the way they would like to do their business. Late 90s and early 2000 is when organization started to invest on Contract Life cycle management packages / tools. This definitely provided a host of tangible business benefits to the end users and also to the buying organization. But, very soon, companies (esp. in Retail and Manufacturing) realized that the package is not flexible enough to manage the growing business needs such as Globalization, changes in business processes like invoicing against contracts etc.

Continue reading "Aligning to the best practices for combating challenges faced in contract management" »

Leveraging contract management in the “R” period

In this dynamic and challenging global environment termed also as “Recession”, I read a series of blogs

The “R” word is probably not a welcome term for sourcing and procurement world – buyer as well as supplier, but it will definitely help in restructuring most of the processes. Contracts Management (with sourcing on the left side) plays a vital role in achieving this – Compliance, Collaboration, Commitment etc

Continue reading "Leveraging contract management in the “R” period" »

Have we funneled out everything in the SRM space, or is there any more oil left in the lamp

……..Looks like we are reaching the saturation level in designing a Supplier relationship management system that can milk the supplier to the extent possible, thats what the enterprise expects the buy side to have on the top of their mind rather than looking at the bigger picture.

It’s a realm for the buy side to have it their way. Let’s listen to a small story.

Customers often ask me this very simple question, and trust me its intimidating at times
“Can we really make an SRM solution like Amazon or eBay”, a solution that doesn’t really need to be that complicated, easily configurable, highly intuitive”, is it that difficult for SRM (Supplier Relationship Management) product vendors to vend out mint fresh, rather than following a grandfather approach. They show me a reverse auction powered by the www , so simple and robust, that am speechless. But I have to explain to them what’s more to SRM from the broader perspective…
 
But the question is
- Why are they comparing?
- Why is the customer still craving for more?
- What are they comparing?

and then the Million dollar question
- What’s more to the story than just auctions and bidding?

To give them the magnitude of an effective SRM solution, we emphasize on the latter being an end to end system that provides them with the Supplier Intelligence through an enterprise-wide, integrated view of a company’s relationships with its suppliers and the commodities or services they provide.
Enabling them collect, analyze and leverage all aspects of their supplier data and purchasing history, giving them that vital insight into their supply base and purchasing history.
Then I go down a level below trying to explain how product vendors have grown beyond standalone ERP solutions and emerged into B2B, trying to get the best out of the internet, its dynamics of enablement, managing relationships electronically and eliminating paper.
The recurring Gartner Quadrant shouts out loud on what’s cooking, where customers should actually be looking, for best of breed bundled over their core applications.
But with the hard hitting IT budget cuts, the Product vendors need to prove to existing and new customers in a Rapid Prototyping mode
Customers have no more patience left, they are confused beyond hope, they are no more flaunted with flashy demo’s or workshops..
 
…….they are looking for a real solution that can be a mash up of “The real enterprise wide solution in its magnitude with a down to earth ease of use”
It’s for us to wait and watch whether its SaaS, homegrown ERP, or the traditional B2B solution providers that will emerge market leaders in the SRM space. Lets see who wins the rat race and gulps the market share "bottom's up"

Whatever it is, it has to be real!!!!!
- Tridip

October 06, 2008

Black and White of Green Procurement – role of procurement professionals

Following up on my original post here, today I offer a look at the role Sourcing and Procurement can play in greening up the supply chain. These range from simple tweaks and easy to adopt changes to full-blown initiatives. Borrowing a leaf from McKinsey’s survey on Green supply chain (synopsis captured in SC Digest here ), it is evident that procurement’s success in reducing the carbon footprint depends largely on their ability to influence their suppliers. A disclaimer before I delve further: contrary to what the title suggests, this is not a tell-all list; there are bound to be additional innovative ways to save the environment; all ears for your views

 

Continue reading "Black and White of Green Procurement – role of procurement professionals" »

October 03, 2008

Procure - O - Marketing

Recently, I read in one of the analyst report that 40-50% of procurement directors (mostly in mid-market) have no clear spend visibility of marketing department. My experience - if you ask sourcing specialists to choose a complex category that they feel savings can still be achieved, the answer would be Procure-o-marketing (marketing spend - why???), esp. printed materials, branding or promotional spend and media space. Thanks to Infosys Procurement Knowledge Exchange meet, in the last few months, me and my colleague Anubhav were able to share our experience and brain storm on the reasons why there is a invisible marketing spend and the strategies that can be adopted to bring the marketing spend under management and eventually experience higher cost savings in this spend - procure-o-marketing...

Continue reading "Procure - O - Marketing" »

September 01, 2008

The oft repeated problem: spend visibility

I remember organizations, in year 2002, raise spend visibility issues – “I do not know how much my company spends with supplier a”; “on what am I spending the maximum dollars?” Six years down the line, with the immense progress made in this field – variety of product vendors, ERP and best-of-breed alike, touting the latest in technology; the bouquet of service offerings including data cleansing and enrichment; the symposiums, seminars and analyst papers harping on the do’s and don’ts – one would expect to confidently bet his money on the demise of such issues. But why then do we still come across the same rues and cries?

Continue reading "The oft repeated problem: spend visibility" »

Overcome procurement challenges resulting through business expansion (M&A) - Part 1

Business expansion and growth, nowadays, through mergers and acquisitions are inevitable – Fact: 42 FORTUNE 1000 corporations were acquired in 2007, biggest buyout frenzy since 2000. Apart from managing the risk of workforce events and re-structuring (Human Resource Harmonization) caused by M&A, organization begins the journey with – “quickly integrate mergers and acquisitions into my enterprise processes and systems”. Talking about process consolidation and IT integration, Sourcing and Procurement processes and systems cannot be left behind. Please remember - Saving $1 in procurement equals $15 to $20 in revenue.

Continue reading "Overcome procurement challenges resulting through business expansion (M&A) - Part 1" »