Content is King…. for whom?
Particularly in the IPTV space, many articles can be found regarding “content as king” with the implication that compelling content will drive viewership, assuming all other things equal such as quality of service, etc. A recent report from Analysys Mason regarding multi-play services (this was the Triple Play of phone, broadband and video/IPTV with mobile not included in the particular analysis) in the Western European market found a “lack of compelling TV content from telcos” and “difficulties in transferring telco brand attributes to the TV content market” as barriers to Telco TV penetration. I definitely agree with the assessment as Telecoms cannot have an inferior offering to current cable incumbents. The issue becomes, at what point does content remain a differentiator and at what price is that content still worth purchasing? There have been numerous US-based IPTV providers announcing expansions of VOD libraries or increased HD offerings just as European IPTV providers have announced rights to sports such as soccer. At some point, these triple play offerings start to look very similar to the end customer which essentially makes a premium offering of video commoditized. We have already seen downward price pressures on the bundles in certain US markets were competition exists with a cable incumbent and Telecom IPTV entrant. This further skews an already difficult business case for IPTV while hampering the ability to pay additional content premiums.
In my opinion, content is part of the “table stakes” offering. Creating compelling experiences that span multiple channels such as broadband, video and mobile will be a true differentiator. This is one of the reasons that we at Infosys have been investing in research projects for personal virtual libraries, products to easily port web content to video or mobile and enabling secure handoffs between network access modes. This involves getting closer to the connected home to enable easy transfer of content between those consumption mediums so current silos of content become transparent to the customer. It is taking the taking the talk of “anytime, anywhere” content and making it a simple reality or compelling experience for the end customer. One very good and simple example is the deployment of multi-room Digital Video Recorders. This is not cross-channel, but it is cross-location in the house and does not tie the user to a particular TV. It is a great experience for the customer. The winners in the Triple Play race will build more experiences like this to differentiate their offering while using content to establish market parity.

Comments
Agreed, content is going to be the King. But, we need to be very sure that out of the 3 mediums namely broadband, video and mobile; which is the one that needs to be targeted. I am sure, it would be Broadband, then mobile and last comes the video. Even if it's the other way round, the fact is that a cable incumbent rules video whereas a telecom entrant have broadband and mobile as stronghold. And with a little investment, a telecom entrant can appeal in the video medium as well. Whereas, a cable incumbent would have a hard time appealing to broadband and mobile. All said and done, it's the content that would differentiate two telecom entrants in IPTV space.
How about exciting features like:
- Video mailbox in addition to voice mailbox on mobile
- Video conferencing just like tleconferencing on mobile
- User setting his identity or presence on either of 3 mediums so that he can be contacted if connected to any 1
- User using his mobile to set his choice of channels to be recorded which eventually gets recorded on the TV set placed at home
Lastly, content would come from the crowd (more the crowd more the mix and match of content) and adding features would just prove to be the crowd puller.
Posted by: Krishna Sanganeria | August 21, 2008 06:50 AM
Krishna,
Great feedback. At least in the US, Cable is making a very strong run into the voip and broadband space by grabbing a significant amount of subscribers who already have the video service. They have yet to make any significant penetration into mobile, so are still short of the quad play. I suppose this conversation has regional differences due to operator capabilities.
I like your ideas of new applications and feel we will be seeing many evolve with new networks and handsets becoming available. Unfortunately bandwidth is usually a limiting factor.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Posted by: Jeremy Kloubec | August 22, 2008 10:40 AM