Infrastructure management is undergoing a transformation. ITIL can help manage conflicting demands like – “low cost but high service quality”, “ubiquitous access but enhanced security”?

Main | June 2007 »

May 30, 2007

Starting the Journey - Aim, Fire, … Ready?

A proven method of initiating an IT Service Management program is to identify a set of processes based on the challenges the organization is facing and perform a current state assessment. The impact a good assessment has on the benefits realized from such a program cannot be doubted. Knowing where you are is absolutely essential to understanding how you will get to the destination.

But how do you know your organization is “ready” to perform an assessment - Is it enough to identify the best practice framework you want to align to? Is it ok to call the consultant right away and put him on the job? Or maybe send some key IT staff for an ITIL training?

From our experience with performing assessments for multiple organizations across the globe, we find organizations achieve varying degrees of success with their ITSM programs, and a key factor seems to be the way the program was initiated. If I were to summarize, the following come out to be important readiness factors to start an ITSM assessment initiative –

  • Define the objectives – What pain points of end-users would the program address? What is the data available to back this up and how reliable is it? I have frequently used End user surveys and IT scorecards for this and they have proved extremely reliable sources.
  • Define the scope – I have been involved in quite a few discussions where the question of “which processes do we start with” has come up. And more often then not, a consensus does not come easy. Organizations that achieved success had used a hypothesis based approach to identify the process areas for assessment based on the pain points of end users and IT staff. At the end of the assessment exercise, the roadmap for detailed process definitions and implementation of initiatives was used to validate or invalidate the hypothesis.
  • Identify the “who” – The “who” of the program includes identifying not just who took the decisions about the budget but more importantly who was needed to provide inputs across the board – Process Customers (aka end users) who were impacted by the process outputs, Process Sponsors who approved the budgets and managed strategic direction for the IT organization, Process Owners who were accountable for the results from the process, and Process Members who did the hard work in operating the process on a day-to-day basis. In a recent client engagement, we spent close to 3 weeks in just identifying and agreeing on the stakeholders to be involved.
  • Network with other initiatives – An often overlooked aspect, this is important to make sure the boundaries and interfaces with other competing initiatives are defined. I was working with a large US utility company on their Release Management program where the question of “overlaps” with the CMM program was perpetually brought up. We addressed the concerns by defining interfaces and hand-offs between the two programs, but the time and effort required to do this mid-way through the program was considerably higher.
  • Include more Functions – I often see ITIL being framed as an “Infrastructure” framework. And therefore the effort being led by the Infrastructure function. Inclusion and active involvement of Application Development, Maintenance and Support teams ensures the “service” and “end user” view is not lost when undertaking process improvement initiatives. In my experience this is easier done, where the initiative is led by the CIO office/ Strategy group/ Quality team, than it is when led by a technology group.

How did your organization get “ready” before starting on the Service Management journey?

May 29, 2007

ITIL V3 - The Fresh New ITIL

The ITIL Buzz

With the release of the new version of the IT Infrastructure Library, or ITIL V3, as it is popularly known, there is a huge amount of interest and anticipation among IT organizations, the user community and service providers as to what the buzz is all about. This blog will revolve around discussions on what ITIL V3 is all about, its new aspects, sharing of thoughts and points of views on its adoption and implications to IT organizations at large.

Questions, questions and more ...

To start with, I listed down below some queries that have regularly come up in discussions that we have had with our clients and colleagues in the industry around V3, that I thought would be interesting to share and discuss:

  • What exactly is ITIL Version 3 all about?
  • What's new: What's different about this version from what's out there already?
  • As an IT organization, what does ITIL V3 mean to me?
    • Do I need to "change" my outlook from a process-oriented approach to a service-oriented approach?
    • How can I assess and benchmark my services / processes against those in V3?
    • Is there a roadmap to help me progress from V2 to V3?
  • As an individual, what does ITIL V3 mean to me?
    • Will my certifications still be valid or do I need to sit for the exams again?
    • I heard there are five books this time. Do I really need to read up all the five new books? I struggled getting through with just two last time - Service Support and Service Delivery. Frown
  • Hey, I am from the IT Development side - ITIL V3 doesn't really impact me. Or does it?
  • And finally, enough talk ! When do we get to see V3?!

In my subsequent blogs, I will dwell more around how the ITIL V3 story is developing and some of our unique experiences with its adoption.

Infosys has been involved in the ITIL V3 Refresh project and several of our consultants, including myself, have provided inputs and reviews as part of the development of the new books. If you have a query on ITIL V3 or have a point of view that you would like to share, please feel free to post them here. We will be happy to discuss!

Business Service Management - Are we there yet?

Is IT really getting closer to business?

    Many organizations, particularly in the last couple of years, have been chasing the el dorado of Business Service Management. This term that appeared first on a few analyst reports a few years back seemed to have an unstoppable momentum. Soon it was the darling jargon of several IT Consultants, system integrators and soon enough even some client managers warmed up to the idea. It seemed logically enough the Next Big Thing. Last year we even saw product vendors like BMC base their product rebranding of their new-version ITSM platform on the BSM theme.

 

     But how succesful are these implementations? Do the investments into these programs really prove worthwhile when looked at from a value-derived perspective rather than the technology upgrade one (which they usually tend to be)? Is there something like a "quick-win" that organizations could look around the BSM area or do most of these implementations turn out to be long-drawn multi-million investments? I was reading a forrester analyst survey amongst recent BSM impleemntations completed recently that gave "zero" marks on timely delivery for these implementations (i.e. Nobody responded that their implementation was delivered with the needed speed) Is this an impression or is it for real?

     A recent survey by forrester amongst CIOs  shows that 52% of the CIOs list Business IT alignment as in their top 3 key concern areas. This is also reflected in the increased demand for BSM tools within the marketplace that help in increasing transparency of IT operations to the business. Also a recent analyst report points out that organizations can reduce more than 25% of their IT operations costs by implementing Business Service Management.

     Our experience in these Business Service Management implementations reveals a recurring theme and pattern in these implementations. For example, organizations that start in this journey, usually pick up Servicedesk optimization / rengineering as one of the first steps. Most organizations have also upgraded their Incident management and Service level management toolsets (sometimes even without supporting SLAs, which makes such implementations interesting to analyze for effectiveness). Several of our CBA (Cost-Benefit Analysis) engagements for BSM investments often tend to end with a predictable outcome. These investments are undertaken not necessarily because there is a long-term cost benefit of doing so, but more because IT's customer organizations are screaming for better levels of services.

     Which boils down to an interesting question? Is Business Service Management about getting closer to business (IT as a partner) or is it all about "servicing" customers better (IT as a service provider?) The current set of investments/initiatives that are happening in this area doesnt necessarily reflect emphasis on the partnership part but give rise to the impression of "firefighting".

     Is it time to move on from that reactive mode? Will this year see a different trend where the focus is more on IT collaboratively working with its business partners rather than IT working as a service provider delivering IT services as per SLAs?

     The theme of this blog is to look at some of the key principles that drive the success of BSM implementations. I will also try to articulate in these narratives a distillation of our learnings from some of these implementations.   

Infosys works with quite a few companies world-wide on helping their IT Service Management programs , in particular with the scope and direction and later with helping them translate the vision into an implementation reality. If you have a query on Business Service Management or have an opinion on the same, please feel free to contact us / post a query here and we will be happy to respond to the same.