IT Matters is a blog for IT professionals interested in improving corporate IT performance and making IT needs evolve to support the business in a flattening world.

« Business Alignment and the CIO | Main | Death by a thousand cuts »

Building differentiation via IT

BUILDING DIFFERENTIATION VIA IT
“.. IT is perceived as valuable by CEOs when it increases speed to market, fosters innovation, provides real-time information, improves productivity and uses information as a competitive weapon. But CEOs are also concerned about IT inhibiting change: IT leaders who can make only incremental changes seem to be creating inertia.” - The Gartner Scenario 2006- The Current State and Future Direction of IT
Michael Porter identified two key sources of competitive advantage
·        Cost leadership
·        Differentiation
Traditionally businesses have chosen to adopt one or the other strategy to achieve competitive advantage; While Information Technology (IT) is positioned to enable an organization to effectively pursue both a) cost leadership and b) differentiation IT must ultimately be aligned with the core strategy of the firm
The case for cost leadership via IT is has been better understood than differentiation. IT has been able to directly support cost leadership. To date organizations have been more successful at achieving cost leadership via IT – e.g. back end process automation, process optimization, strategic sourcing and other similar strategies than;
The case for building competitive advantage with IT via ‘differentiation’ requires IT organizations innovate themselves and work closely with new product / service innovation groups. Ultimately it is information that allows a firm to create a defensible position for itself against the five forces. The extent to which IT organization can provide competitive advantage via IT depends on the organization’s ability to drive value from “Information” component of the ultimate product / service.
A number of external and internal factors (forces) enable organizations to drive value from information - among them are
1)      Adoption of enabling technologies  (RFID, SOA) – Process innovation using these technologies
2)      Increasing digital conversion
3)      Smarter end consumers
4)      Integration within the business partners in the ecosystem (M&A activity)
5)      Innovation within the ecosystem

The next series of blogs will develop Points of Views regarding - How can organizations achieve differentiation based competitive advantage via IT?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://infosysblogs.com/IT-matters-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/6

Comments

It makes a lot of sense for Indian IT firms to not compete solely on cost, because as wages are rising in the job market in India, there will be increase in the costs of the IT firms. Also, many American software companies prefer software professionals who have had an experience in India, thus Indian IT professional are in demand and don't come cheap.

Well said Dilip!

Competing on price is something that will move to different destinations than India. For instance, Brazil, Slovakia, China, etc. These markets may have their set of entrepreneurs who have an edge over the Indian service providers.

Thus, the sooner the Indian companies move up the value chain the better.

Wage inflation due to intense competition for employable talent has led to higher attrition rates for Infy (13.7%: ref: http://www.infosys.com/investor/reports/quarterly/2006-2007/Q4/FactSheet.pdf p.5.)

However, Infy has a relief from the fact that they are still doing better on attrition levels than many other service providers and certainly better than the MNCs who set up their shops in India.

It will be interesting to watch how Infy will handle the climb in the value-chain.

McKinsey has come up with a new parameter for performance now - "profit per employee". http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/article_abstract.aspx?ar=1924

To accomplish this, Infy is facing a new challenge:
a. how to reduce attrition rate?
b. how to get higher value work and change the image from being a low-cost service provider to that of a reliable partner.

I wish they get it right to make it work through the next phase.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)